BIOS601 AGENDA: Thursday September 10, 2015
[updated August 27, 2015 --please notify JH if you encounter any glitches]
 Agenda for Thursday Sept 10, 2015 
  
     
 -   Discussion of issues in the 
  Assignment on measurement
 
 Q1 and Q2 (measuring 'Readability'): answers need not be handed in; just think about the issues;
  If there is time, we might discuss and do some 'measuring' in class.
 
 Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q14: Answers to be handed in.
 
 Q8, Q9, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13: answers need not be handed in. If there's time,
  you and we will think about what the answers to them might have looked like.
 
 Remarks: this topic of measurement is probably new for you, as it was for JH
  when he began in cancer clinical trials in 1973, and oncologists (cancer doctors)
  were judging responses of advanced cancer to chemotherapy
  by measuring tumours by 
 'palpation'.
 
 Just because (random) measurement errors tend to cancel out in
 averages doesn't mean that errors in measurement can be ignored. For example,
 how comfortable would you be in measuring how much physical activity JH does  
 by  having him wear a 'step-counter' for a randomly selected week of the
 year, and using that 1-week
 measurement as an 'x' in a multiple or logistic or Cox
 regression? See slides 7 and 8 from part of JH's
 "Scientific reasoning, statistical thinking, measurement issues, and use of
 graphics: examples from research on children"
 at Royal Children's Hospital in Melbourne, earlier this year.
 pdf
 
 Some of the the terminology will be new to you, and so (as you will discover
 if you do run the simulations in Q8 -- you are encouraged to do so -- of how well you can estimate the conversion factors between
 degrees F and degrees C) will some of the consequences of measurement error.
 The "animation (in R) of effects of errors in X on slope of Y on X" might be of interest,
 as might the java applet accompanying "Random measurement error 
 and regression dilution bias".
 
 These consequences are rarely touched on, yet alone emphasized, in theoretical courses on regression, where all
 'x' values are assumed to be measured without error! Welcome to the REAL world.
 
 For this exercise, and the topics it addresses, the most relevant portions of 
 the 'surveys' resources are 
   
              Measurement: Reliability and Validity and               
 
              Effects of Measurement Error
 
 Computing issues that may arise in Q14: Dates are a pain, even in R. If you get stuck,
 use some of the R code  supplied, to compute week and day of week. Incidentally, whereas the exercise
 makes reference to 104 weeks, there are a few weeks with some missing data, so best 
 keep them out of the calculations for now (in practice JH would try to use all the data, but the
 imbalanced data have a messier EMS structure that -- for now -- distracts us from the main point).